China reveals new subsidies for AEV industry 03-07-2018

Recently, several Chinese government departments, including the Ministry of Industry and Information, have revealed a notice regarding the subsidies for AEV. It says that the new energy vehicle subsidy policy needs adjustment and that local governments are prohibited from taking any protectionist measures.


 


In February 2018, several Chinese government departments, including the Ministry of Industry and Information, have revealed the Notice to Adjust and Optimize the Policy on the Fiscal Subsidy for the Application Promotion of Alternative Energy Vehicle. According to market intelligence firm CCM, the notice introduced the Proposal to Subsidize the Promotion of Alternative Energy Vehicle and the Technical Requirements on Products related to Alternative Energy Vehicle. In summary, it says that the new energy vehicle subsidy policy needs adjustment and that local governments are prohibited from taking any protectionist measures. 



China's 2018 alternative energy vehicle (AEV) subsidies prioritize electric cars which are able to drive long distances. Subsidies for vehicles with low ranges on the other hand are getting phased-out soon.




It is worth noticing, that China is putting a lot of effort on the development of AEVs, not only because of the severe pollution problem but also because of the country’s heavy dependence on imported oil, which is seen as a key strategic vulnerability. An auto industry plan released last year aims to set AEVs making up all the future sales growth in the country. China is considering ending production and sales of automobiles powered by gasoline and diesel in the near future. Considering, that by 2020, China is projected to have around 300 million automobiles, which would surpass the current amount in the USA by 35 million, the country wants to lead the green revolution in the automobile sector.



According to CCM, the adjusted subsidy proposal would help stabilize the market and would maintain normal operation of the industry chain. It is favourable for the development of the passenger vehicle segment, it is a strong stability to the growth of the bus segment, and it is a restriction on the blossom of the special vehicle segment. There are five main points in the new notice.



First of all, the central budget for subsidies will be more limited. In 2017, a total of 800,000 AEVs were promoted finally, which should be subsidized with around USD9.52-11.10 billion. This was beyond the budget and was a direct cause of the subsidy decline. In fact, part of the vehicle types was promoted at a scale beyond expectation.


 

Secondly, the ministries agreed on the necessity to purify the industry environment. After all, measurements that have been taken against subsidy cheating around 2015 and 2016 didn’t lead to the hoped success. Up to now, there are still some opportunistic practices for subsidy cheating. Hence it is the main target for the administration to optimize the subsidy quota for passenger vehicle and to reduce the subsidy quota for a commercial vehicle.




Furthermore, the new subsidy aims to support quality and strong enterprises and to improve the threshold. The adjustment this time is aimed at improving the technical threshold and reducing the subsidy quota, which increases the requirements on vehicle manufacturers and battery makers. Now the industry enters orderly development, during which the superior will be selected and the inferior will be eliminated. The makers who fail to reach the requirements on performance and decrease the prices to the industry standard will be phased out.





Fourthly, the cost is competitiveness even though the subsidy is decreased. That means the cost for AEV has decreased greatly after years of development. Profits can be made from Level A vehicle, given that the subsidy is reduced, and the price of Level A00 vehicle has fallen to a level almost equal to a traditional vehicle. Obviously, the cost decline is a solid foundation for the policy adjustment. Now AEV manufacturers are making profits far higher than traditional vehicle makers.



Finally, other impacts are greater than what is brought by fiscal subsidy. In view of the market promotion in 2017, 65% of the passenger vehicles are gathered in cities such as Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen, where the purchase is restricted. This means that the other impacts are greater than the impact of subsidy policy.



 


CCM predicts that in the year 2018, about 1.10 million AEVs will be promoted in the domestic market. Of this, the first half will witness promotion of over 600,000 and the second half will focus on high-quality Level AB vehicle.


Industry insiders believe that in 2018, the thresholds of the domestic power battery business regarding both cost and technology will be improved greatly. The battery makers who are able to offer quality products to the passenger vehicle manufacturers will step into quick development and the differentiation will grow clearer. The makers who fail to meet the demand from passenger vehicle manufacturers are expected to seek breakthroughs in the field of logistics vehicle or to carry out business activities in new fields such as energy storage. Otherwise, huge pressure and challenges will face them.



About the article



The information for this article is provided by CCM, China’s leading market intelligence provider for the fields of agriculture, chemicals, food and feed.


Join the discussion by visiting our LinkedIn and Facebook groups.


 Follow CCM on Twitter: @CCM_Kcomber 





Subscribe to our Newsletter



Next Press